Paradigm and Hypotheses

This document plots the results of a 60 min version of Opposite Cueing, which is analyzed in “Cueing_Analysis_OppOnly.Rmd”. In this code, analyses will be done to see what differences there are between the groups that demonstrated a reversal of their cueing effect vs. showed only the classic cueing effect. Subjects wwere split into three groups based upon their performance on the last quarter of the experiment (i.e., final 3 blocks): (1) Better at Opposite Location, (2) Better at Same Location, and (3) No difference. Data for each of these groups was then plotted in order to investigate the stability of this pattern over either each half of the experiment or each quarter of the experiment.

Note: all error bars are within-subject SEM. Subjects who had a d’ of less than .5 or greater than 3 overall, or more than 10% of trials marked as RT outliers, were excluded.

Cueing task accuracy (N = 45) after exclusion

Size of d’ cueing effect for each subject

HigherSameLoc count
Better at Opp Loc 16
Better at Same Loc 26
No difference 3

D’ by experiment half and cueing group

D’ by block and cue condition



Size of RT cueing effect in each subject

RT effect size by Experiment Half

RT effect size by block

Statistics