Paradigm and Hypotheses

This document plots the control analyses of a 60 min version of Opposite Cueing. For a full description of the task, see Cueing_Analysis_OppCue_All. We’ll be looking at whether the averaged-over task features, such as target location or target turn, matter for task performance. We will also be looking at whether conclusions vary significantly based upon whether the counterpredictive task was performed second (V1) or first (V2). Data loaded is post-exclusion, leaving 50 subjects.

Plots

Target d’ by target location

## Automatically converting the following non-factors to factors: cueValidity, targLoc

Target d’ by target rotation direction

## Automatically converting the following non-factors to factors: cueValidity, targTurn

3-way interaction d’

## Automatically converting the following non-factors to factors: cueValidity, curTask

3-way interaction RT

## Automatically converting the following non-factors to factors: cueValidity, curTask

3-way interaction RT

## Automatically converting the following non-factors to factors: cueValidity, curTask

Target accuracy by vividness rating

## Automatically converting the following non-factors to factors: ConfidenceResponse

Statistics

We’ll run ANOVAs that include both cue validity and task (as in the main analysis) while also including task version (i.e., task order), in order to see whether cueing effects vary based upon which order the tasks were performed in - for d’, RT, and VR.


d’ ANOVA

Effect DFn DFd SSn SSd F p p<.05 ges partial_eta_squared
1 VersionNum 1 48 1.223 70.159 0.837 0.365 0.014 0.017
2 cueValidity 1 48 2.221 5.452 19.553 0.000 * 0.025 0.289
4 curTask 1 48 0.638 8.048 3.806 0.057 0.007 0.073
3 VersionNum:cueValidity 1 48 0.081 5.452 0.712 0.403 0.001 0.015
5 VersionNum:curTask 1 48 0.199 8.048 1.186 0.282 0.002 0.024
6 cueValidity:curTask 1 48 0.122 3.540 1.650 0.205 0.001 0.033
7 VersionNum:cueValidity:curTask 1 48 0.103 3.540 1.402 0.242 0.001 0.028


RT ANOVA

Effect DFn DFd SSn SSd F p p<.05 ges partial_eta_squared
1 VersionNum 1 48 28954.469 11938998.1 0.116 0.734 0.002 0.002
2 cueValidity 1 48 25.350 393274.0 0.003 0.956 0.000 0.000
4 curTask 1 48 9331.279 2448254.0 0.183 0.671 0.001 0.004
3 VersionNum:cueValidity 1 48 28199.209 393274.0 3.442 0.070 0.002 0.067
5 VersionNum:curTask 1 48 1229509.139 2448254.0 24.106 0.000 * 0.075 0.334
6 cueValidity:curTask 1 48 44458.199 378590.8 5.637 0.022 * 0.003 0.105
7 VersionNum:cueValidity:curTask 1 48 26323.326 378590.8 3.337 0.074 0.002 0.065


VR ANOVA

Effect DFn DFd SSn SSd F p p<.05 ges partial_eta_squared
1 VersionNum 1 48 1.096 62.925 0.836 0.365 0.016 0.017
2 cueValidity 1 48 0.017 1.122 0.738 0.394 0.000 0.015
4 curTask 1 48 0.154 4.085 1.804 0.186 0.002 0.036
3 VersionNum:cueValidity 1 48 0.015 1.122 0.660 0.421 0.000 0.014
5 VersionNum:curTask 1 48 0.003 4.085 0.041 0.841 0.000 0.001
6 cueValidity:curTask 1 48 0.134 0.309 20.785 0.000 * 0.002 0.302
7 VersionNum:cueValidity:curTask 1 48 0.057 0.309 8.855 0.005 * 0.001 0.156